EcoAdvice
wpe134271d_0f.jpg
wp685617a5_0f.jpg

Terms and conditions of use:

Raphael Edwards does not endorse organisations linked to on this site, nor is providing any financial advice, the links are provided purely for information. Please ensure you read all terms and conditions for any products or organisations you may enter into dealings with.  Raphael Edwards accepts no liability for any damages or losses as a result of transactions with any of these companies or as a result of any advice given.  By using this site you accept these terms and conditions. © 2012 Raphael Edwards AIEMA

 

Welcome to the EcoAdvice blog

18 December 2011

 

In the run up to Christmas I’ve been thinking about how much travel people do over Christmas visiting relatives, and how we all tend to travel on the motorway whenever possible; this got me pondering my daily commute into work.  I have a long commute to work everyday, typically around an hour.  I know it’s not very environmentally friendly driving to work but there aren’t practical train links from where I live, however, I do have the most economical car I can afford, it’s a fairly new 1.4l petrol engine car.  There are three different routes I can take into work, one has no motorway, one is about a third motorway, and one nearly all motorway; but the extra motorway makes each route approximately 5 miles longer the others.  Interested in the economies of steady motorway driving, compared to the start/stop at all those traffic lights on the A-roads, I decided to do some analysis.  I was interested to see whether fuel saving on any of the routes would offset the additional mileage. I thought the results were interesting, so have decided to share with you.

 

The longest motorway route had the worst fuel consumption, being 43.7mpg, the reduced middle distance motorway route was 47.1mpg and the shortest non motorway route was 48.5mpg.  It was clear that the extra distance was not offset in any way by better mileage, and the more motorway the worse the fuel economy, however, one other factor comes in to play, the time taken.  Both motorway routes took on average 60 minutes, so the longer route is now definitely out, costing £559 extra per year, but saving no time at all; the shortest route took 10 minutes longer, although saved a further £358 per year.  Now as green as I like to be, I also value my time with my family, so I need to consider whether the £358 cost saving is worth the 77 hours lost time with my family over the year….probably not.

 

It is useful to analyse different routes if you are a regular driver, and it was easy for me as I had a trip meter in the car that gave average mileage that I could reset for each journey.  If you don’t have one, then driving the same route for a few days from a full tank, noting the mileage, and seeing how much fuel it takes to fill up again, will provide the same information. 

 

Alternatively, and probably easiest, Google maps will give you a rough idea on the fuel cost for any journey you input.  I’m not sure how accurate it is, as for me it estimated at £3 more than the real cost for each of the routes, but it should give a rough comparison.

 

 

10 July 2011

 

Launched a Facebook page for Eco Advice to allow quick upload of news and information.

 

© 2011 Raphael Edwards AIEMA